The artists "recommended" to me are as follows: Francis Bacon, Neo Rauch, Angela Dufresne, Lisa Yuskavage, Lucian Freud, Muntean/Rosenblum, Eric Fischl:
FRANCIS BACON
was an Irish-born painter whose paintings depicted surrealistic figures and portraits in a rather painterly fashion. His figures or faces are often amorphous and blob-like, with either a dark or warm-colored background. Distorted faces and mouths, often open with teeth showing, are common themes. His work was often based from images and it often portrayed some kind of painful experience and/or isolation.
NEO RAUCH
is a German artist whose colorful surrealistic paintings explore many personal and political themes. They are figurative and shift between abstraction and representation, often combining several scenes in a dream-like manner. To Rauch, painting is an extension of the dream world.
ANGELA DUFRESNE
is a painter whose very painterly, watery works are often representational though moving into abstraction through swift brushwork and swipes of bright coloration. There are often figures as subjects, as some part of narrative from real life or from films.
LISA YUSKAVAGE
is an American painter whose work predominately works with well-rendered female figures, treating the female form in a bulbous or curvy manner, adorning it with flowers, fruits, or other plant like things. The females are often nude and very feminine. Her works are seen as "confrontationally sexual" with vague to overt eroticism.
LUCIAN FREUD
is a British figural painter of often fleshy, pale persons (painted from live model). The figures, often nude and reclining, are well rendered and nearly realistic, sometimes adding extra definition of shadows and angles which accentuate bodily forms.
MUNTEAN/ROSENBLUM
are collaborating figural painters whose figures are often based on youth figures from magazines and whose well-rendered paintings feature some pseudo-philosophical caption at the bottom. There is often some mysterious scene or narrative involving the young figures, who are positioned in strangely contrasting modeled poses.
ERIC FISCHL
is an American figural painter whose rather realistically drawn figures are often based from live observation or model, and are frequently nude and/or at a beach or other water source, with attention to light. The figures are either publicly or privately nude, shifting the feeling of voyeurism.
Of these artists, the two who most resemble my work either in image, process, or concept, are Francis Bacon and Neo Rauch.
Francis Bacon's molding anthropomorphic imagery is quite similar to my explorations of shifting abstract figural forms. His interest in the emotion represented through these mutated and seemingly mutilated figures mirrors mine. This piece by Bacon, for example:
is quite similar in concept to my recently completed piece of figures on a bed.
In this case, it is a warped figure on a chair. However, he has a more successful sense of atmosphere than I have yet discovered, and perhaps should take a page from his book concerning how to resolve the space around an abstracted form. Perhaps a more solidly colored background is successful in most cases.
Neo Rauch shares my interest in personal and political concepts and creating mixed scenes of seemingly random but meaningful elements. His figures are more representational than I usually do, but having more fully representational figures in my paintings seems undoubtedly a worthwhile exploration into more literal meaning, straying outside of the constant ambiguity of my paintings. His paintings make me want to delve more into precision-type surrealistic painting.
This painting of Rauch's combines my interest in molded form, seemingly random objects, and blending rendered form with painterly aspects (such as his pink sky).
At some point I would like to achieve the surrealist-landscape-narrative effect which he succeeds in.
Painter's Progress
Saturday, April 2, 2011
Thursday, March 3, 2011
Blogging Assignment 1 - Reflections on the 30 Studies
Due to my oversight of the need to upload images of my studies for this assignment, I had left my 30 studies in the painting storage room, so I will not be able to include images of my studies in this post until tomorrow. My apologies.
My 30 studies assignment started out well. I figured I should just play around with style, content, and technique, just to see what I could come up with and perhaps find a direction. I started with studies of very abstracted hands, a very linear face, a surreal scene, and geometric abstractions. Then I tried some palate knife studies of figures and skeletons. Then I developed a series of ideas starting with a painting of a bed, then of nude figures on a bed, then of nude figures in masks. I came upon another idea of visually representing aspects of the Qaballistic tarot, per a friend of mine's request. Then I decided to try painting a vision I'd had of a broken and abandoned business building in the desert. After that, the ideas ran out, so I tried some more abstract pieces and minimalist pieces. Lastly, I came upon an unused canvas board and made an abstract figural painting somewhat similar to the first study.
This last study seemed especially favored in the critique. There was also interest in the idea with the figures on the bed. So for my first painting I decided to combine these two ideas into abstracted figures on a bed. However, there are still the questions of what kinds of paintings I will do next. Should I stick with some of the main ideas from the studies? Should I perhaps do more idea-combining? Should I bother using the palate knife technique I used in the studies for a painting? Should I stick to my theme of abstracted figures, or try my hand at different kinds of abstraction, or even non-abstraction? How can I play with texture in some form of abstraction? I am thinking that in order to challenge myself, I should A. do an abstraction piece that is of a very large scale that I am not used to, and B. I should do at least one painting that is not abstraction. So, I am thinking of making the building-in-the-desert idea into one of my final paintings.
In terms of contemporary artists whose work exemplifies in form, content, and subject the work I'd like to do this semester, I am currently in love with the paintings of James Jean. In particular, these works by him...
...exemplify the kind of combinations of abstraction and rendering (in tangled kind of masses) I am interested in. The dingy atmospheric coloration with minimal background is something I also like to employ, and would like to continue to employ in my current project. The way Jean accents forms with fine bright lines contrasts with the smokey muted colors and is an inspiring way to tie the space together.
Another artist whose work parallels what I am trying to do is Dan Sutterland. In particular, this piece:
...has the kind of color schematics and blocking together of shapes I would like to work with. However, I can't decide if I should have more or less painterly mark-making in my pieces as he has in his.
The way Francis Bacon distorts figures and faces also appeals to me:
The way spaces can be opened up in a body or face in an organic, almost sensual way is intriguing to me. I should like to explore the grainy effect that he uses to perhaps better my approach.
I should take note of his less flowing and more harshly painted figures...
for a direction for a new approach to abstraction and figural representation.
As far as paintings with landscapes go, for my one representational drawing, I would love to do something hyper-realistic, but my skills don't quite reach that level yet. So perhaps I should go for a more mottled effect like that of Odilon Redon (among others):
I don't have much experience with the mottled style of painting, so it would be something new for me. It might be an opportunity for me to play with texture, too.
My 30 studies assignment started out well. I figured I should just play around with style, content, and technique, just to see what I could come up with and perhaps find a direction. I started with studies of very abstracted hands, a very linear face, a surreal scene, and geometric abstractions. Then I tried some palate knife studies of figures and skeletons. Then I developed a series of ideas starting with a painting of a bed, then of nude figures on a bed, then of nude figures in masks. I came upon another idea of visually representing aspects of the Qaballistic tarot, per a friend of mine's request. Then I decided to try painting a vision I'd had of a broken and abandoned business building in the desert. After that, the ideas ran out, so I tried some more abstract pieces and minimalist pieces. Lastly, I came upon an unused canvas board and made an abstract figural painting somewhat similar to the first study.
This last study seemed especially favored in the critique. There was also interest in the idea with the figures on the bed. So for my first painting I decided to combine these two ideas into abstracted figures on a bed. However, there are still the questions of what kinds of paintings I will do next. Should I stick with some of the main ideas from the studies? Should I perhaps do more idea-combining? Should I bother using the palate knife technique I used in the studies for a painting? Should I stick to my theme of abstracted figures, or try my hand at different kinds of abstraction, or even non-abstraction? How can I play with texture in some form of abstraction? I am thinking that in order to challenge myself, I should A. do an abstraction piece that is of a very large scale that I am not used to, and B. I should do at least one painting that is not abstraction. So, I am thinking of making the building-in-the-desert idea into one of my final paintings.
In terms of contemporary artists whose work exemplifies in form, content, and subject the work I'd like to do this semester, I am currently in love with the paintings of James Jean. In particular, these works by him...
...exemplify the kind of combinations of abstraction and rendering (in tangled kind of masses) I am interested in. The dingy atmospheric coloration with minimal background is something I also like to employ, and would like to continue to employ in my current project. The way Jean accents forms with fine bright lines contrasts with the smokey muted colors and is an inspiring way to tie the space together.
Another artist whose work parallels what I am trying to do is Dan Sutterland. In particular, this piece:
...has the kind of color schematics and blocking together of shapes I would like to work with. However, I can't decide if I should have more or less painterly mark-making in my pieces as he has in his.
The way Francis Bacon distorts figures and faces also appeals to me:
The way spaces can be opened up in a body or face in an organic, almost sensual way is intriguing to me. I should like to explore the grainy effect that he uses to perhaps better my approach.
I should take note of his less flowing and more harshly painted figures...
for a direction for a new approach to abstraction and figural representation.
As far as paintings with landscapes go, for my one representational drawing, I would love to do something hyper-realistic, but my skills don't quite reach that level yet. So perhaps I should go for a more mottled effect like that of Odilon Redon (among others):
I don't have much experience with the mottled style of painting, so it would be something new for me. It might be an opportunity for me to play with texture, too.
Tuesday, February 22, 2011
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)